God did not create the universe, says Hawking – Yahoo! News.
Hawking also sounds like Spinoza when he claims: “Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist.”
September 2, 2010
God did not create the universe, says Hawking – Yahoo! News
By Jeffrey Bell
This entry was posted on Thursday, September 2nd, 2010 at 9:59 am and posted in Spinoza. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
3 responses to “God did not create the universe, says Hawking – Yahoo! News”
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
-
Recent Posts
Top Posts
- Latour on factishes and belief
- philosophy and pedagogy
- Adam Smith, Deleuze, and Compositionalism
- Badiou's misreading of Spinoza (and hence of Deleuze by association)
- Monism = Pluralism
- Parrots and Concepts
- Spinoza or Leibniz
- Discursive and Non-Discursive Philosophy
- Eternity and Duration in Spinoza
- Dewey...the most important philosopher of the twentieth century
Blogroll
economy
Reading Matter
- Anarchai Blog
- Archaeolog
- Archive Fire
- Berube's blog
- Contemporary Culture
- Critical Animal
- Deontologistics
- Grundlegung
- how the university works
- immanence
- Jon Cogburn's blog
- k-punk
- Larval Subjects
- Latour's website
- McShandy\’s
- Metastable Equilibrium
- Minds and Brains
- Object-Oriented Philosophy
- Philosophy in a time of error
- Pitchfork (music reviews)
- Planomenology
- plastic bodies
- Protevi's Blog
- Public Reason
- Shaviro's blog
- Speculative Heresy
- Trancissions
Wordpress
Archives
Categories
- Adam Smith
- analytic philosophy
- Aristotle
- Badiou
- Camus
- Comedy
- Compositionalism
- Contemporary Culture
- David Lewis
- Deleuze
- Dewey
- Dialetheism
- Donald Davidson
- Economy
- Foucault
- Frege
- Graham Priest
- Higher Education
- Hume
- Ladyman and Ross
- Latour
- Leibniz
- Maimon
- Marx
- Meillassoux
- Merleau-Ponty
- Moritz Schlick
- OOO
- Philosophy
- politics
- PSR
- Robert Brandom
- scientism
- Seneca
- Speculative Realism
- Spinoza
- Tarde
- Track and Field
- Uncategorized
- Whitehead
- Wilfrid Sellars
- William James
- Wittgenstein
Topics
- Adam Smith (1)
- analytic philosophy (2)
- Aristotle (1)
- Badiou (1)
- Camus (1)
- Comedy (1)
- Compositionalism (1)
- Contemporary Culture (2)
- David Lewis (2)
- Deleuze (25)
- Dewey (1)
- Dialetheism (3)
- Donald Davidson (2)
- Economy (5)
- Foucault (2)
- Frege (1)
- Graham Priest (3)
- Higher Education (1)
- Hume (9)
- Ladyman and Ross (1)
- Latour (5)
- Leibniz (2)
- Maimon (1)
- Marx (1)
- Meillassoux (2)
- Merleau-Ponty (1)
- Moritz Schlick (1)
- OOO (1)
- Philosophy (2)
- politics (1)
- PSR (2)
- Robert Brandom (6)
- scientism (1)
- Seneca (3)
- Speculative Realism (4)
- Spinoza (16)
- Tarde (1)
- Track and Field (2)
- Uncategorized (34)
- Whitehead (1)
- Wilfrid Sellars (2)
- William James (1)
- Wittgenstein (1)
Themes
Adam Smith analytic philosophy Badiou Compositionalism Contemporary Culture David Lewis Deleuze Dialetheism Donald Davidson Economy Foucault Graham Priest Higher Education Hume Latour Leibniz Maimon Marx Meillassoux Philosophy politics PSR Robert Brandom Seneca Speculative Realism Spinoza Track and Field Uncategorized Whitehead Wilfrid Sellars
September 7th, 2010 at 11:49 am
Doesn’t there have to be a mass of formless something which may be brought to a critical point for spontaneous creation to occur?
September 7th, 2010 at 12:12 pm
Hi Anti Vigilante
I’ve not read Hawking’s new book so I’m not sure if he’s added anything new to his no-boundary theory of the universe, by which he means that we need to understand the origins in terms of quantum mechanics and Feynmanian probabilities rather than in terms of the singularities of Einsteinian relativity theory. According to the no-boundary theory there is no point, no boundary, where one can say there was or was not something, where formless becomes formed, etc. You have spontaneous creation without beginning. Paradoxical as it may sound, it’s what I take Hawking to be arguing. Here’s a link that explains it a bit more:
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/hawking/universes/html/bound.html
September 7th, 2010 at 10:17 pm
wonderful… so who stopped it from spontaneously creating then?
quantum mechanics lacks mechanics – it’s just the evolution of quantum statistics.