Category Archives: Deleuze

Continental Connections

I’ve begun a weekly blog post over at New APPS, what I’m calling Continental Connections Thursday. My intention is to write much along the lines of what I’ve written over here at Aberrant Monism (and I will likely do riffs … Continue reading

Posted in Deleuze | 3 Comments

conceptual automata

With midterms out of the way I’ve been able to begin preparing for some upcoming events. In particular, I’ll be one of the lecturers at this year’s Deleuze Camp, along with Ian Buchanan, Dan Smith, and Ron Bogue (there are … Continue reading

Posted in Deleuze, Robert Brandom, Wilfrid Sellars | Tagged | Leave a comment

Dewey…the most important philosopher of the twentieth century

At the Leiter blog there was an interesting thread (here) concerning Philip Kitcher’s recent essay, “Philosophy Inside Out” (here). Given the current state of support for philosophy (or lack thereof) within the academy, it was not surprising that many of … Continue reading

Posted in Deleuze, Dewey | 3 Comments

the relevance of philosophy (Frege or Spinoza)

Frege’s famous essay, “On Sinn and Bedeutung,” begins with the problem of identity, or equality. If a and b designate the same thing, Frege argues, then ‘it would seem that a = b could not differ from a = a.’ … Continue reading

Posted in Deleuze, Frege, Spinoza | 1 Comment

real patterns all the way down

After hearing and reading about Ladyman and Ross for some time now, with opinions ranging from volatile dislike to euphoric endorsement, I’ve finally taken the time to read Every Thing Must Go and come to my own conclusions. I’ll use … Continue reading

Posted in Deleuze, Ladyman and Ross, scientism | 6 Comments

Spinoza and OOO

I’ve been thinking through a number of issues related to Spinoza and OOO, extending conversations I’ve had with Levi over whether one can read Spinoza in a way that is compatible with OOO while at the same time not bastardizing … Continue reading

Posted in Deleuze, OOO, Spinoza | 7 Comments

the nondenumerable

The work of Graham Priest and Gilles Deleuze (and Félix Guattari) converge in significant ways on the concept of the nondenumerable. Turning to Priest first, and to his Beyond the Limits of Thought especially, one finds in this book an … Continue reading

Posted in Deleuze, Dialetheism, Graham Priest | 24 Comments

From Normative to Problematizing Semantics

In my previous posts on Brandom, I may have come across as unduly critical, or as dismissive. That couldn’t be further from the truth. There is much that I find in Brandom’s work that is important, and that I will … Continue reading

Posted in Deleuze, Robert Brandom | 2 Comments

Life and mentality

I want to second Graham Harman’s point about the usefulness of Shaviro’s most recent post. I am intrigued in particular by Shaviro’s following claim: Whitehead is not a vitalist — he doesn’t believe everything is alive. But he does argue … Continue reading

Posted in Deleuze | 1 Comment

Spinoza Upside Down

Steven Shaviro’s post lays out quite nicely the contrast, as he sees it, between Spinoza-Deleuze and Whitehead. In essence this boils down to what role, if any, the virtual plays in their work. As a longtime admirer of Whitehead’s work … Continue reading

Posted in Deleuze, Spinoza | Leave a comment